<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CTRLALT313373.com - Team Dynamics</title>
    <link>http://weblog.ctrlalt313373.com/</link>
    <description>.Net Wanderings</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>David A. Osborn</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 08:53:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 2.3.9074.18820</generator>
    <managingEditor>davido@ctrlalt313373.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>davido@ctrlalt313373.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://weblog.ctrlalt313373.com/Trackback.aspx?guid=d1facc08-9f3b-436d-8f19-d2d6b5731bb0</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://weblog.ctrlalt313373.com/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://weblog.ctrlalt313373.com/PermaLink,guid,d1facc08-9f3b-436d-8f19-d2d6b5731bb0.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://weblog.ctrlalt313373.com/CommentView,guid,d1facc08-9f3b-436d-8f19-d2d6b5731bb0.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://weblog.ctrlalt313373.com/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=d1facc08-9f3b-436d-8f19-d2d6b5731bb0</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
          <img align="left" src="http://weblog.ctrlalt313373.com/content/binary/101808_0853_YieldingtoY1.jpg" alt="" />This
isn't a post about blindly following someone, but this is a posting about acknowledging
and yielding to your colleague's specific knowledge in an area. We all don't and can't
know everything and each of us as individuals has spent time developing our knowledge
in specific areas of expertise. I sit in countless meetings where everyone feels the
need to question and understanding everything. Once you realize that you can't understand
everything, you then get to limit your scope and you are going to find that your life
is a lot easier (and meetings much shorter and productive). One of the important reasons
that we have teams is that each individual brings a unique set of skills to the table
and at some point when you don't understand something you need to yield to the "expert"
on your team, or possible outside your team, on the subject matter. I use the term
expert loosely because I consider very few people I know to be a complete expert on
any specific subject matter, but I do consider people around me to be experts over
me in a subject matter. Just as we yield to a master chef to prepare a meal properly,
we need to yield to our colleagues in their areas of expertise. Sure most of us know
how to prepare a hamburger, but there are obviously much more complicated dishes that
we could/should never attempt. I am not a master at UI design and I don't claim to
be. Sure I can put a button and a grid on the screen, but I have no problems yielding
to an "expert" colleague in this area. This doesn't mean that you can't way in when
you think something is a completely bad idea, but when the conversation/debate continues
to drag on and a decision needs to be made then the "expert" needs to be yielded to.
This also doesn't imply that everyone on the team has an expertise. Some members are
still too green, and unfortunately in some cases a team member has enough problems
staying up with the basics to ever dive deeper into a topic. These individuals just
need to realize that they can't understand everything right away and sometimes they
just need to sit back and listen. I understood about 10% of the <a href="http://www.iadnug.org/">IADNUG</a> meetings
when I first started attending and it took me a better part of a year before I fell
in stride with the other members. I'm not saying you shouldn't ask questions, but
sometimes you should sit back, absorb the information, and realize that you don't
understand it now, but in the future when you seen more examples, more applications,
and have absorbed more you might and until then you can yield to the "expert". Of
course all this still leaves you needing to decide who are the "experts" on your team
and what are they "experts" in….
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://weblog.ctrlalt313373.com/aggbug.ashx?id=d1facc08-9f3b-436d-8f19-d2d6b5731bb0" />
      </body>
      <title>Yielding to Your Colleague’s Expertise</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.ctrlalt313373.com/PermaLink,guid,d1facc08-9f3b-436d-8f19-d2d6b5731bb0.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://weblog.ctrlalt313373.com/2008/10/18/YieldingToYourColleaguesExpertise.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 08:53:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img align="left" src="http://weblog.ctrlalt313373.com/content/binary/101808_0853_YieldingtoY1.jpg" alt="" /&gt;This
isn't a post about blindly following someone, but this is a posting about acknowledging
and yielding to your colleague's specific knowledge in an area. We all don't and can't
know everything and each of us as individuals has spent time developing our knowledge
in specific areas of expertise. I sit in countless meetings where everyone feels the
need to question and understanding everything. Once you realize that you can't understand
everything, you then get to limit your scope and you are going to find that your life
is a lot easier (and meetings much shorter and productive). One of the important reasons
that we have teams is that each individual brings a unique set of skills to the table
and at some point when you don't understand something you need to yield to the "expert"
on your team, or possible outside your team, on the subject matter. I use the term
expert loosely because I consider very few people I know to be a complete expert on
any specific subject matter, but I do consider people around me to be experts over
me in a subject matter. Just as we yield to a master chef to prepare a meal properly,
we need to yield to our colleagues in their areas of expertise. Sure most of us know
how to prepare a hamburger, but there are obviously much more complicated dishes that
we could/should never attempt. I am not a master at UI design and I don't claim to
be. Sure I can put a button and a grid on the screen, but I have no problems yielding
to an "expert" colleague in this area. This doesn't mean that you can't way in when
you think something is a completely bad idea, but when the conversation/debate continues
to drag on and a decision needs to be made then the "expert" needs to be yielded to.
This also doesn't imply that everyone on the team has an expertise. Some members are
still too green, and unfortunately in some cases a team member has enough problems
staying up with the basics to ever dive deeper into a topic. These individuals just
need to realize that they can't understand everything right away and sometimes they
just need to sit back and listen. I understood about 10% of the &lt;a href="http://www.iadnug.org/"&gt;IADNUG&lt;/a&gt; meetings
when I first started attending and it took me a better part of a year before I fell
in stride with the other members. I'm not saying you shouldn't ask questions, but
sometimes you should sit back, absorb the information, and realize that you don't
understand it now, but in the future when you seen more examples, more applications,
and have absorbed more you might and until then you can yield to the "expert". Of
course all this still leaves you needing to decide who are the "experts" on your team
and what are they "experts" in….
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://weblog.ctrlalt313373.com/aggbug.ashx?id=d1facc08-9f3b-436d-8f19-d2d6b5731bb0" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://weblog.ctrlalt313373.com/CommentView,guid,d1facc08-9f3b-436d-8f19-d2d6b5731bb0.aspx</comments>
      <category>Team Dynamics</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>